National Council of Teachers of English

Position Statement on the Role of Nonfiction Literature (K–12)

Overview

Contemporary nonfiction for young people plays a crucial role in the reading and writing lives of K–12 students. It is a rich and compelling genre that supports students’ development as critically, visually, and informationally literate 21st century thinkers and creators. The purpose of this position statement is to propose a paradigm shift for teaching and learning with nonfiction literature in K–12 education.

Unlike many textbooks and materials written for online or print-based school curriculum, nonfiction literature for young people does more than communicate information (Moss, 2003; Sanders, 2018). Nonfiction literature contextualizes primary source evidence, offers multiple perspectives on current and historic events, and shares new scientific discoveries.

Contemporary nonfiction addresses historical silences; explores historic and contemporary events rooted in racism, oppression, and violence; and highlights courageous trailblazers and organized groups working toward societal transformation and liberation. It presents cutting-edge research, offering readers not just settled information, but access to emerging understandings at the vanguard of scientific knowledge and exploration (Aronson, 2011; Giblin, 2000; Isaacs, 2011).

Nonfiction empowers young people in the face of current and emerging challenges locally and globally, such as racial, cultural, social, and economic injustice, censorship and disinformation, and the climate crisis. In the urgency of this moment, nonfiction for young people has never been more vibrant or vital.

Introduction

Nonfiction is published for all ages in many formats: board books, picture books, beginner readers, graphic nonfiction, transitional chapter books, and long-form. Featuring engaging text, captivating art, and dynamic design that inspires as well as informs, today’s nonfiction is ideal for a wide range of educational uses as well as independent reading. Referred to as a literature of fact (Moss, 2003) and a literature of questions (Sanders, 2018), contemporary nonfiction literature provides fact-based, well-documented explorations of topics that captivate readers.

By its very name, nonfiction literature is defined by what it is not: fiction. It has also been named and renamed in ways that reveal different attributes of its identity: informational text, information books, literary nonfiction, and more (Colman, 1999; Sanders, 2018; Zarnowski & Turkel, 2011; Zarnowski & Turkel, 2012). Using rich language embedded in expository and narrative writing, nonfiction conveys information that is factually true and accurate, drawing upon vetted and verifiable source material (Colman, 1999; Freedman, 1998). Though nonfiction leverages literary elements also found in fiction, it does not employ fiction.

For more than thirty years, the criteria for NCTE’s Orbis Pictus Award® for Outstanding Nonfiction for Children [1] have articulated what comprises high-quality nonfiction literature: accuracy in texts and illustrations, supported by documentation; organization; writing style; illustrative style; and book design. Today’s nonfiction literature offers readers a richer and more diverse range of topics, authors’ and illustrators’ notes that help readers to understand the source material and creative processes behind the book, captivating page turns, and beautifully designed formats that build a multimodal experience that is both informative and compelling (Gill, 2009; Isaacs, 2011). Reading nonfiction is not simply about taking in information. It is a deeply enriching aesthetic experience.

Nonfiction Is Underrepresented in K–12 Education

Kids Love Nonfiction

While it’s widely recognized that many adults enjoy reading nonfiction, the same is not always assumed for young people.

Although adults tend to select fiction to share with children (Conradi Smith et al., 2022; Jacobs et al., 2000; Håland et al., 2021; Robertson & Reese, 2017), research shows that most young readers enjoy nonfiction, and many prefer it (Clark & Teravainen-Goff, 2020; Correia, 2011; Doiron, 2003; Ives et al., 2020; Mohr, 2006; Moss & Hendershot, 2002; Repaskey et al., 2017; Robertson & Reese, 2017). For some children, nonfiction is a gateway to literacy (Caswell & Duke, 1998; Hynes, 2000) as well as a portal to knowledge that sparks curiosity and fuels a sense of wonder (Jobe and Dayton-Sakari, 2002).

Young people need adults who foster access to high-quality nonfiction books because they appreciate the power of these titles to excite and inspire as well as inform readers of all ages. A just and equitable educational system that values and empowers all learners is one in which every child, tween, and teen has the space to explore their curiosities, interests, and identities. With so much to offer young people as readers and thinkers, nonfiction should play a far more robust role in the reading and learning lives of young people in and out of school.

Nonfiction Literature Is Underutilized in the Language Arts Curriculum and Classroom Libraries

Given the limited role and time spent on nonfiction in elementary classrooms (Duke, 2000), efforts have been made via state standards and professional organizations to increase the role of nonfiction literature and informational text in K–12 education. Yet, fiction continues to have a dominant role in reading and language arts instruction, while nonfiction is frequently underrepresented (Dreher & Kletzien, 2015). Even when nonfiction is addressed, it is often studied through the use of basal readers and online texts that lack the richness of exceptional nonfiction literature in both the quality of information and the quality of presentation.

Perhaps these circumstances remain relatively unchanged because many states no longer require courses in children’s and young adult literature as part of their teacher preparation programs, denying teachers the opportunity to learn about this essential body of work (NCTE, 2018). In addition, nonfiction book awards and book lists are not as well-known as their fiction counterparts. These include NCTE’s Orbis Pictus Award® for Outstanding Nonfiction for Children [1], the American Library Association’s Sibert Informational Book Medal [2], and the subject-based book lists created by the National Science Teaching Association [3], the National Council for the Social Studies [4], and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [5], which include many nonfiction books. For classrooms in underresourced communities with high concentrations of minoritized populations, financial constraints, coupled with the lack of access to certified school librarians or media specialists (Hadjioannou, 2021; Lance & Kachel, 2021), put nonfiction literature even further out of reach.

Exceptional nonfiction should serve as a mentor text for student writing. But in an age of standardized testing, much of the nonfiction writing young people do in school is limited to the genre of test-driven essay writing and short responses, which does not reflect authentic nonfiction writing. Too often, students are not given the time and freedom to explore topics of personal interest or enthusiastically share their new knowledge with others.

These practices send the wrong message to young people—that nonfiction isn’t as valid and valuable as fiction, and that it’s not meant for everyday enjoyment.

The Information Literacy Crisis

Cultivating children’s information literacy at the earliest of ages is an essential element of 21st century literacy learning. Exposure to a variety of nonfiction texts ensures students are able to develop their capacity to critically evaluate information, the perspectives of authors and experts, and systems of power (Elmborg, 2006).

With an overabundance of information and an increase of misinformation, there is a need for greater access to nonfiction scientific literature, as well as rigorous instruction on how to critically evaluate sources (Gu & Feng, 2021). Without exposure to credible scientific information found in nonfiction texts, students are more likely to experience mistrust of scientific knowledge (Haider & Sundin, 2022).

Book banning and censorship also remain perennial concerns, frequently targeting nonfiction created by authors and illustrators from marginalized and minoritized communities. The elimination of these texts from curricula, libraries, and classrooms is a systemic silencing of voices. Our literacy classrooms must be sites that affirm and honor multiple identities and cultures, foster pride in students’ communities, offering both windows and mirrors (Bishop, 1990) of contributions across the global human community. Without access to nonfiction literature from a variety of voices and perspectives, students are limited to a dominant view of history, which selectively erases the contributions of marginalized people and obscures the processes by which histories are composed.

Another impediment to students’ information literacy development is the fact that time devoted to social studies and science instruction at the elementary level has diminished (Au, 2009; Blank, 2013; Duke, 2019b; Griffith & Scharmann, 2008). This is more pronounced in underresourced schools, where students are even more likely to experience limited science and social studies instruction at the elementary level (Duke, 2019b; Fitchett et al., 2014).

Recommendations to Expand the Use of Nonfiction

Encourage Nonfiction Literature as Independent Reading across PreK–12

Nonfiction literature, with its varied formats and subjects, has something to offer readers across the developmental continuum. For our youngest students, nonfiction provides an introduction to the idea that books can be sources of information, offering a multimodal avenue for the exploration of information presented through both words and visual images. As students grow older, a broader range of nonfiction texts are suitable, and when matched to students’ interests and passions, these texts can cultivate a passion for reading and deepen knowledge of the world.

To support readers’ exposure and access to nonfiction reading, ELA professionals can:

Students will gain confidence, knowledge, and satisfaction through these transactions, and their experiences reading nonfiction will propel them to seek out and engage with nonfiction throughout their lives (Duke, 2007).

Use Nonfiction Literature in Reading Instruction

Traditional notions of reading development operate under the assumption that children first learn to read, and then read to learn (Chall, 1983). This implies that readers must know how to decode words before they can learn information from text. This is simply not true (Duke, 2019a). Readers at all stages of development can glean knowledge from text (Cabell & Hwang, 2020; Cervetti & Hiebert, 2018). Nonfiction literature is ideal for reading instruction, as it introduces students to a vast array of topics across subject areas, allowing them to build knowledge, expand vocabulary, and experience different perspectives (Kiefer, 2009; Wooten & Rowe, 2018).

To leverage nonfiction to support readers’ skill and strategy development, ELA professionals can:

ELA teachers adhere to goals and objectives that guide their planning and instructional decisions. Nonfiction literature provides opportunities to support those goals while engaging students in authentic, intrinsically motivating work.

Use Nonfiction Literature in Writing Instruction

Nonfiction writing is often assumed to be better suited for older children and teens (Newkirk, 1989). However, research demonstrates that younger learners enthusiastically and competently write and illustrate nonfiction, mirroring their world and the things within it that fascinate them (Britsch, 2002; Duke, 2000; Newkirk, 1989). Nonfiction writing is for everyone!

As noted in the NCTE Position Statement on Writing Instruction in School [7], “writing is an important form of self-expression and communication as well as a tool for thinking, reflecting, and learning” (2022). Engaging, high-quality nonfiction literature can serve as inspiration for student writers. It also introduces writers at all stages of development to a vast array of formats, structures, purposes, research processes, and writing and illustrating styles.

To leverage nonfiction to support writers’ development, ELA professionals can:

Nonfiction writing offers vital opportunities for children to explore their passions and showcase their expertise. Nonfiction literature, through its compelling content and variety of text structures, styles, and formats, can serve as enjoyable and accessible mentor texts to support young writers as they raise their voices about issues and topics that matter to them.

Use Nonfiction Literature to Teach Research Processes and Information Literacy

Nonfiction texts ignite the curiosity of students, help them develop the critical thinking skills required to evaluate sources, and offer access to a multiplicity of voices and perspectives. Exceptional nonfiction books embody an elegant balance between exacting research and engaging text and illustrations. While researching their topics, book creators seek and study primary sources, visit locales, read scientific treatises, and observe and talk to scientists and other experts. The books they create reflect this painstaking immersion, which in turn ignites the curiosity of young people. These books also capture the process of scientific exploration and offer well-lit pathways through complex histories, events, and historical silences. Because professionals in different fields have distinctive ways of constructing new knowledge and communicating those new understandings to others in and outside of their field, developing familiarity with these disciplinary literacies is a vital component of students’ literacy development (Cervetti, 2021; Moje, 2015; Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008).

There is an urgency to hear and engage with the voices of those who have been historically excluded. Nonfiction texts provide possibilities to redefine what counts as credible information, to legitimize non-Western ways of knowing, and to revitalize culturally diverse practices (Burmester & Howard, 2022). Nonfiction texts that are integrated with indigenous knowledge create relevancy, igniting students’ enthusiasm for scientific knowledge, sustainability, and social justice (Handayani et al., 2018). Students must be allowed to grow into critical consumers of information, developing the critical and analytic thinking skills required to question dominant narratives and explain whose voices are legitimized and whose are marginalized in nonfiction literature (Burmester & Howard, 2022).

To leverage nonfiction to support students’ understanding of research processes and information literacy, ELA professionals can:

When young people read nonfiction literature with a critical eye, models of disciplinary and information literacy are normalized and diverse ways of knowing are recognized. Students can grow comfortable with the notion that knowledge is never fixed; even the most established understandings are open to refinement and reinterpretation. Readers will know how to evaluate the trustworthiness and perspective of a nonfiction book and apply similar standards when encountering claims of fact in other areas of their lives.

Use Nonfiction Literature to Support Visual Literacy

Nonfiction literature has never been more visually engaging. Technological advances in printing, artistic innovation, and expanded representation of illustrators from diverse backgrounds offer dynamic and dazzling visual displays in all forms of nonfiction, from the picture book to the chapter book (Giblin, 2000; Isaacs, 2011; Salisbury & Styles, 2020).

Visual literacy is broadly defined as strategies and skills related to engagement with, comprehension of, and the interpretation of visual images. Approaches to reading instruction that utilize visual literacy methodologies, including visual thinking strategies (Yenawine, 1997), increase opportunities for equitable access to the curriculum for all students, including students with language and reading disabilities (Cappello & Walker, 2016; Crawford & Calabria, 2018) and multilingual students (Louie & Sierschynski, 2015).

Because nonfiction books are research-based, readers may be tempted to assume that they represent indisputable facts and “truths” about the world. However, reading, writing, and illustrating nonfiction are all interpretative processes. Within the reading process, visual literacy is an essential component of meaning making that helps deepen text understanding (Barone & Barone, 2016) and supports the composition of multimodal products [8] (Witte & Dail, 2018). As an interpretative aspect of readers’ response to literature, visual literacy includes cognitive, affective, critical, social, cultural, and political elements connected to experience, identity, and place-based contexts of reading and viewing (Serafini, 2014).

To leverage nonfiction to support students’ visual literacy, ELA professionals can:

In our increasingly visual culture, it is imperative that young people learn how to evaluate images and discern the ways in which visual elements frame information, shape perspectives, and represent points of view.

Use Nonfiction Literature to Diversify the Curriculum PreK–12 and Practice Critical Literacies

Within the context of a nation that values free speech, it is important to disrupt any presumptions that nonfiction is neutral (Dávila & Elovich, 2021). Like fiction, nonfiction texts are political (Gardner et al., 2021). As political texts, nonfiction provides a landscape for fostering readers’ critical literacy skills, which are essential to becoming active participants in a democracy (Powell et al., 2001). Informed citizens of pluralistic societies appreciate multiple perspectives and worldviews (Eck, 2006) and acknowledge the dangers of any single story (Adichie, 2009).

Children’s nonfiction is well-suited for students’ critical multicultural analysis (Crisp et al., 2021; Yenika-Agbaw, 2021). Such analyses attend to the examination of implicit and explicit biases and the interrogation of dominant sociocultural ideologies and power structures (Botelho & Rudman, 2009). They are grounded in the notion that like fiction, nonfiction texts are crafted for specific groups of readers (Dávila, 2012), often regarded as the ideal or implied audiences (Nikolajeva, 2005). With these audiences in mind, children’s nonfiction offers a medium in which students can begin to identify and interrogate sociocultural stereotypes and social narratives of the dominant or mainstream culture (Reese & McEntarffer, 2021; Rodriguez & Kim, 2021). In a “post truth” era of “fake news,” as described by Comber et al. (2018), it is essential for students to learn to analyze nonfiction texts to cultivate the skills of a critical citizenry.

To leverage nonfiction to support students’ critical literacy, ELA professionals can:

Nonfiction literature, a “literature of questions” (Sanders, 2018), diversifies the curriculum and helps students to develop critical perspectives. But more importantly, it serves as a vehicle for recognizing patterns of systemic silencing and oppression, makes visible biases and injustices, and ignites the urgency for taking justice-oriented action.

 

Recommended Resources

Colman, P. (2007). A new way to look at literature: A visual model for analyzing fiction and nonfiction texts. Language Arts, 84(3), 257–268.

Crisp, T., Knezek, S. M., & Gardner, R. P. (Eds.). (2021). Reading and teaching with diverse nonfiction children’s books: Representations and possibilities. NCTE.

Dávila, D. (2012). In search of the ideal reader for children’s nonfiction books about el Día de Los Muertos. Journal of Children’s Literature, 38(1), 16–26.

Duke, N. K. (2019, March 5). Speaking up for science and social studies [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAWO2lvAnjI [9]

Enriquez, G., & Schulman-Kumin, A. (2014). Searching for “truth”: Using children’s nonfiction for social justice and Common Core goals. Journal of Children’s Literature, 40(2), 16–25.

Giblin, J. (2000). More than just the facts: A hundred years of children’s nonfiction. Horn Book Magazine, 76(4), 413–424.

Stewart, M. (Ed.). (2020). Nonfiction writers dig deep: 50 award-winning authors share the secret of engaging writing. NCTE.

Yenika-Agbaw, V., Hudock, L. A., & Lowery, R. M. (Eds.). (2018). Does nonfiction equate truth? Rethinking disciplinary boundaries through critical literacies. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Zarnowski, M., & Turkel, S. (2011). Nonfiction literature that highlights inquiry: How real people solve real problems. Journal of Children’s Literature, 37(1), 30–37.

References

Adichie, C. (2009, July). The dangers of a single story. [Video]. TED Conferences. https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_ngozi_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story?language=en [10]

Alexander, J., & Jarmin, R. (2018). The pleasures of reading nonfiction. Literacy, 52(2), 78–85.

Aronson, M. (2011). New knowledge. Horn Book Magazine, 87(2), 57–62.

Au, W. (2009). Social studies, social justice: W(h)ither the social studies in high-stakes testing? Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(1), 43–58.

Barone, D., & Barone, R. (2016). “Really,” “not possible,” “I can’t believe it”: Exploring informational text in literature circles. The Reading Teacher, 70(1), 69–81.

Behrman, E. H. (2006). Teaching about language, power, and text: A review of classroom practices that support critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49(6), 490–498.

Bishop, R. S. (1990). Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors. Perspectives, 6(3), ix–xi.

Blank, R. K. (2013). Science instructional time is declining in elementary schools: What are the implications for student achievement and closing the gap? Science Education, 97(6), 830–847.

Botelho, M.J., & Rudman, M.K. (2009). Critical multicultural analysis of children’s literature: Windows, mirrors, and doors. Routledge.

Britsch, S. J. (2002). Beyond stories: Young children’s nonfiction composition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315853680 [11]

Burmester, & Howard, L. C. (2022). Confronting book banning and assumed curricular neutrality: A critical inquiry framework. Theory Into Practice, 61(4), 373–383.

Cabell, S. Q., & Hwang, H. (2020). Building content knowledge to boost comprehension in the   primary grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S99–S107. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.338 [12]

Calo, K. M. (2011). Incorporating informational texts in the primary classroom: A research-based rationale, practical strategies, and two teachers’ experiences. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39(4), 291–295.

Cappello, M., & Walker, N. T. (2016). Visual thinking strategies: Teachers’ reflections on closely reading complex visual texts within the disciplines. The Reading Teacher, 70(3), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1523 [13]

Caswell, L. J., & Duke, N. (1998). Non-narrative as a catalyst for literacy development. Language Arts, 75(2), 108–117.

Cervetti, G. N. (2021). Science-Literacy Integration: Content-area literacy or disciplinary literacy? Language Arts, 98(6), 340–351.

Cervetti, G. N., & Hiebert, E. H. (2018). Knowledge at the center of English language arts instruction. The Reading Teacher, 72(4), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1758 [14]

Chall, J. (1983). Stages of reading development. McGraw-Hill.

Clark, C., & Teravainen-Goff, A. (2020). Children and young people’s reading in 2019: Findings from our annual literacy survey [15]. National Literacy Trust.

Colman, P. (1999). Nonfiction is literature, too. The New Advocate, 12(3), 215–223.

Colman, P. (2007). A new way to look at literature: A visual model for analyzing fiction and nonfiction texts. Language Arts, 84(3), 257–268.

Comber, B., Janks, H., & Hruby, G. G. (2018). Texts, identities, and ethics: Critical literacy in a post-truth world. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(1), 95–99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26632941 [16]

Correia, M. (2011). Fiction vs. informational texts: Which will your kindergarteners choose? Young Children, 66(6), 100–104.

Conradi Smith, K., Young, C. A., & Core Yatzeck, J. (2022). What are teachers reading and why?: An analysis of elementary read aloud titles and the rationales underlying teachers’ selections. Literacy Research and Instruction, 61(4), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.2008558 [17]

Crawford, P. A., & Calabria, K. (2018). Exploring the power and processes of friendship through picturebooks. International Journal of the Whole Child, 3(2), 25–34.

Crisp, T., Knezek, S., & Gardner, R. (2021). Reading and teaching with diverse nonfiction children’s books. NCTE.

Dávila, D. (2012). In search of the ideal reader for children’s non-fiction books about el Día de Los Muertos. Journal of Children’s Literature, 38(1), 16–26.

Dávila, D., & Elovich, S. (2021). Religious holidays in nonfiction literature for young children. In T. Crisp, S. Knezek, & R. Gardner (Eds.), Reading and teaching with diverse nonfiction children’s books (pp. 114–129). NCTE.

Dawes E.T., Cappiello, M.A., Magee, L. B., Bryant, J., & Sweet, M. (2019). Portraits of perseverance: Creating picturebook biographies with third graders. Language Arts, 96(3), 153–166.

Doiron, R. (2003). Boy books, girl books: Should we re-organize our school library collections? Teacher Librarian, 30(3), 14.

Dorn, L. J., & Soffos, C. (2005). Teaching for deep comprehension: A reading workshop approach. Stenhouse Publishers.

Dreher, M. J., & Kletzien S. B. (2015). Teaching informational text in K–3 classrooms: Best practices to help children read, write, and learn from nonfiction. Guilford Press.

Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224.

Duke, N. K. (2007). Using non-fiction reference materials with young children. Let’s look in a book. Young Children, 62(3), 12–16.

Duke, N. K. (2019a). Reading by third grade: How policymakers can foster early literacy. State Education Standard, 19(2), 6–11.

Duke, N. (2019b, March 4). Speaking up for science and social studies. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAWO2lvAnjI [9]

Eck, D.L. (2006). What is pluralism? [Video]. http://pluralism.org/ [18]

Elmborg. (2006). Critical information literacy: implications for instructional practice. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2), 192–199.

Enriquez, G., & Schulman-Kumin, A. (2014). Searching for “truth”: Using children’s nonfiction for social justice and Common Core goals. Journal of Children’s Literature, 40(2), 16–25.

Fitchett, P. G., Heafner, T. L., & Lambert, R. G. (2014). Examining elementary social studies marginalization: A multilevel model. Educational Policy, 28(1), 40–68. https://doi-org.ezproxyles.flo.org/10.1177/0895904812453998 [19]

Freedman, R. (1998). On telling the truth. The Booklist, 95(2), 224–225.

Gardner, R. P. (2017). Language arts lessons: Discussing racial trauma using visual thinking strategies. Language Arts, 94(5), 338–345.

Gardner, R., Knezek, S., & Crisp, T. (2021). Introduction: Diverse nonfiction in preK–8 classrooms. In T. Crisp, S. Knezek, & R. Gardner (Eds.), Reading and teaching with diverse nonfiction children’s books (pp. xv–xxi). NCTE.

Giblin, J. (2000). More than just the facts: A hundred years of children’s nonfiction. Horn Book Magazine, 76(4), 413–424.

Gill, S. R. (2009). What teachers need to know about the “new” nonfiction. The Reading Teacher, 63(4), 260–267.

Graff, J.M., & Shimek, C. (2020). Revisiting reader response: Contemporary nonfiction children’s literature as remixes. Language Arts, 97(4), 223–234.

Griffith, G., & Scharmann, L. (2008). Initial impacts of No Child Left Behind on elementary science education. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(3), 35–48.

Gu, C., & Feng, Y. (2021). Influence of public engagement with science on scientific information literacy during the COVID‑19 pandemic. Science & Education, (31)3, 619–633.

Hadjioannou, X. (2021). Access to high-quality, diverse book collections across a variety of challenging times and contexts. The Dragon Lode, 40(1), 8–16.

Haider, & Sundin, O. (2022). Information literacy challenges in digital culture: Conflicting engagements of trust and doubt. Information, Communication & Society, 25(8), 1176–1191.

Håland, A., Hoem, T. F., & McTigue, E. M. (2021). The quantity and quality of teachers’ self-perceptions of read-aloud practices in Norwegian first grade classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 49(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-020-01053-5 [20]

Handayani, R.D., Wilujeng, I., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2018). Elaborating indigenous knowledge in the science curriculum for the cultural sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(2), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2018-0016 [21]

Hynes, M. (2000). “I read for facts”: Reading nonfiction in a fictional world. Language Arts 77(6), 485–495.

Horakova, M. (2021). Between vulnerability and resistance: Rhetorical strategies in Indigenous Canadian nonfiction. Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 56(3), 390–403.

Isaacs, K. T. (2011). The facts of the matter: Children’s nonfiction, from then to now. Horn Book Magazine, 87(2), 10–18.

Ives, S. T., Parsons, S. A., Parsons, A. W., Robertson, D. A., Daoud, N., Young, C., & Polk, L. (2020). Elementary students’ motivation to read and genre preferences. Reading Psychology, 41(7), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2020.1783143 [22]

Jacobs, J. S., Morrison, T. G., & Swinyard, W. R. (2000). Reading aloud to students: A national probability study of classroom reading practices of elementary school teachers. Reading Psychology, 21(3), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710050144331 [23]

Jobe, R., & Sakari, M. D. (2002). Info-kids: How to use nonfiction to turn reluctant readers into enthusiastic learners. Pembroke Publishers.

Kearns, D. M., Lyon, C. P., & Pollack, M. S. (2021). Teaching world and word knowledge to access content-area texts in co-taught classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 56(4), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451220944371

Kiefer, B. Z. (2009). Charlotte Huck’s children’s literature in the elementary school, (10th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Lance, K. C., & Kachel, D. E. (2021). Perspectives on school librarian employment in the United States, 2009–10 to 2018–19. SLIDE: The School Librarian Investigation—Decline or Evolution? https://libslide.org/publications/perspectives [24].

Louie, B., & Sierschynski, J. (2015). Enhancing English learners’ language development using wordless picture books. The Reading Teacher, 69(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1376 [25]

MacLeod, L. (2021). More than personal communication: Templates for citing Indigenous elders and knowledge keepers. KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies, 5(1), 1–5.

Moje, E. B. (2015). Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 254–278.

Mohr, K. A. J. (2006). Children’s choices for recreational reading: A three-part investigation of selection preferences, rationales, and processes. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_4 [26]

Moses, L., & Serafini, F. (2022). Image, text and design: Students’ semiotic choices in nonfiction compositions. Literacy, 56(4), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12293 [27]

Moss, B. (2003). Exploring the literature of fact: Children’s nonfiction trade books in the elementary classroom. Guilford Press.

Moss, B., & Hendershot, J. (2002). Exploring sixth graders’ selection of nonfiction trade books: When students are given the opportunity to select nonfiction books, motivation for reading improves. The Reading Teacher, 56(1), 6–17.

NCTE. (2018). NCTE Position statement: Preparing teachers with knowledge of children’s and young adult literature. NCTE. https://ncte.org/statement/chiladollitguideline [6]

NCTE. (2022). NCTE Position statement on writing instruction in school. https://ncte.org/statement/statement-on-writing-instruction-in-school [7]

Newkirk, T. (1989). More than stories: The range of children’s writing. Heinemann.

Nikolajeva, M. (2005). Aesthetic approaches to children’s literature: An introduction. Scarecrow Press.

Powell, R., Cantrell, S. C., & Adams, S. (2001). Saving Black Mountain: The promise of critical literacy in a multicultural democracy. The Reading Teacher, 54(8), 772–781. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20204992 [28]

Reese, D., & McEntarffer, B. (2021). Indigenous nations in nonfiction. In T. Crisp, S. Knezek, & R. Gardner (Eds.), Reading and teaching with diverse nonfiction children’s books (pp. 41–57). NCTE.

Repaskey, L., Schumm, J., & Johnson, J. (2017). First and fourth grade boys’ and girls’ preferences for and perceptions about narrative and expository text. Reading Psychology, 38(8), 808–847.

Robertson, S.L., & Reese, E. (2017). The very hungry caterpillar turned into a butterfly: Children’s and parents’ enjoyment of different book genres. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 17(1), 3–25.

Rodriguez, N.N., & Kim, E.J. (2021). Beyond the model minority and forever foreigner: Asian American children’s nonfiction. In T. Crisp, S. Knezek, & R. Gardner (Eds.), Reading and Teaching with Diverse Nonfiction Children’s Books (pp. 58–78). NCTE.

Salisbury, M., & Styles, M. (2020). Children’s picturebooks: The art of visual storytelling (2nd ed.). Laurence King Publishing.

Sanders, J. S. (2018). A Literature of questions: Nonfiction for the critical child (1st ed.). University of Minnesota Press.

Serafini, F. (2014). Reading the visual: An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy. Teachers College Press.

Serafini, F., Kachorsky, D., & Reid, S. (2018). Revisiting the multimodal nature of children’s literature. Language Arts, 95(5), 311–321.

Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40.

Short, K.G. (2018). Building our capacity to teach with nonfiction. In V. Yenika-Agbaw, L.A. Hudock, & R.M. Lowery (Eds.), Does nonfiction equate truth? Rethinking disciplinary boundaries through critical literacy (pp. xiii–xviii). Rowman & Littlefield.

Smith, J.M., & Robertson, M. K. (2019). Navigating award-winning nonfiction children’s literature. The Reading Teacher, 73(2), 195–204.

Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214–240.

Stewart, M. (Ed.). (2020). Nonfiction writers dig deep: 50 award-winning authors share the secret of engaging writing. NCTE.

Stewart, M., & Correia, M. (2021). 5 kinds of nonfiction: Enriching reading and writing instruction with children’s books. Stenhouse.

Washburn. (2007). Storytelling: The heart of American Indian scholarship. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 31(1), 109–119.

Witte, S., & Dail, J. S. (2018). Critical engagements with literature: Guiding youth as they read, compose, and participate in the world. In J. S. Dail, S. Witte, & S.T. Bickmore (Eds.), Young adult literature and the digital world: Textual engagement through visual literacy (pp. xv–xix). Rowman & Littlefield.

Wooten, D. A., & Rowe, K. M. (2018). Biographical picturebooks are winning awards and teachers’ and students’ attention. In D. A. Wooten, L. A. Liang, & B. E. Cullinan (Eds.), Children’s literature in the reading program: Engaging young readers in the 21st century (pp. 107–124). Guilford Press.

Yenawine, P. (1997). Thoughts on visual literacy. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, & S.B. Heath (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 845–46). Simon and Schuster.

Yenika-Agbaw, V. (2021). A critical multicultural analysis of power relationships in selected nonfiction picturebooks. In T. Crisp, S. Knezek, & R. Gardner (Eds.), Reading and teaching with diverse nonfiction children’s books (pp. 3–18). NCTE.

Yenika-Agbaw, V., Lowery, R.M., Hudock, L. A., and Ricks, P.H. (2018). Exploring nonfiction literacies: Innovative practices in teaching. Rowman and Littlefield.

Young, T. A., & Moss, B. (2006).  Nonfiction in the classroom library: A literacy necessity.  Childhood Education, 82(4), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2006.10522824 [29]

Zarnowski, M., & Turkel, S. (2011). Nonfiction literature that highlights inquiry: How real people solve real problems. Journal of Children’s Literature, 37(1), 30–37.

Zarnowski, M., & Turkel, S. (2012). Creating new knowledge: Books that demystify the process. Journal of Children’s Literature, 38(1), 28–34.

Statement Authors

Xenia Hadjioannou, Co-chair, Penn State University, Berks Campus

Mary Ann Cappiello, Co-chair, Lesley University

Patricia Bandré, Salina Public Schools

Matthew Burgess, Brooklyn College & Nonfiction Author

Patricia Crawford, University of Pittsburgh

Denise Dávila, University of Texas, Austin

Roberta Price Gardner, Kennesaw State University

Kari Johnston, Austin Independent School District

Ruth Lowery, University of North Texas

Melissa Stewart, Nonfiction Author