NCTE
  • Search
  • Blog
  • Shop
  • My Account
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Search
  • Blog
  • Shop
  • My Account
  • Membership
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Research
  • Groups
  • About
  • Get Involved
  • Renew!
  • Join!
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Position Statements

NCTE and its constituent groups have developed position statements on a variety of education issues vital to the teaching and learning of English language arts.

< Back to Resources

Position Statements

  • Resolutions
  • Submit a Resolution
  • All Position Statements
  • NCTE Process for Adopting Official Guidelines and Short Documents
Position Statements
  • Resolutions
  • Submit a Resolution
  • All Position Statements
  • NCTE Process for Adopting Official Guidelines and Short Documents

Resolution on Mandatory Grade Retention and High-Stakes Testing

Date: February 28, 2015
Category: Professional Concerns
Print Statement

Approved by NCTE Members Voting at the Annual Business Meeting for the
Board of Directors and Other Members of the Council, November 2014

Ratified by a Vote of the NCTE Membership, February 2015

Background

Grade retention as a major element in education and reading policy has been adopted by at least 14 states, with 32+ states linking reading intervention to high-stakes testing (Rose, 2012). These policies ignore four decades of research on the negative consequences of grade retention and the significant body of research on effective and supportive literacy instruction.

Grade retention, the practice of holding students back to repeat a grade, does more harm than good:

  • retaining students who have not met proficiency levels with the intent of repeating instruction is punitive, socially inappropriate, and educationally ineffective;
  • basing retention on high-stakes tests will disproportionately and negatively impact children of color, impoverished children, English Language Learners, and special needs students; and
  • retaining students is strongly correlated with behavior problems and increased drop-out rates.

As such, grade retention represents a system of ill-advised policies increasingly based on misleading advocacy resulting in a recursive cycle of punishment for young people, diminishing their sense of belonging, and reducing their opportunity for educational equity.

The academic benefits of retention are limited, short-lived, and far outweighed by the negative consequences on students’ development in reading, writing, and all other aspects of literacy. In fact, negative social, emotional, and academic effects of grade retention, at every level, are ongoing and persist into adulthood. Educators, policymakers, and political leaders must oppose the practice of retention.

The current pattern of political and public embrace of grade retention as a significant element in reading policy ignores decades of research refuting grade retention. Be it therefore

Resolution

Resolved, that the National Council of Teachers of English strongly oppose legislation mandating that children, in any grade level, who do not meet criteria in reading be retained.

And be it further resolved that NCTE strongly oppose the use of high-stakes test performance in reading as the criterion for student retention.

This position statement may be printed, copied, and disseminated without permission from NCTE.

  • About
  • Get Involved
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Groups
  • Membership
  • FAQs
  • Donations
  • Blog
  • Shop
  • Contact Us
  • Press
  • Advertisers
  • Career Opportunities
  • NCTE Connects

Subscribe to INBOX

INBOX is a biweekly email wrap-up of the most important stories in English language arts education, ideas for your classroom, and news from NCTE.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • YouTube

© 1998-2020 NCTE. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Links Policy
  • Terms of Use