NCTE
  • Search
  • Blog
  • Shop
  • My Account
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Search
  • Blog
  • Shop
  • My Account
  • Membership
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Research
  • Groups
  • About
  • Get Involved
  • Renew!
  • Join!
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Position Statements

NCTE and its constituent groups have developed position statements on a variety of education issues vital to the teaching and learning of English language arts.

< Back to Resources

Position Statements

  • Resolutions
  • Submit a Resolution
  • All Position Statements
  • NCTE Process for Adopting Official Guidelines and Short Documents
Position Statements
  • Resolutions
  • Submit a Resolution
  • All Position Statements
  • NCTE Process for Adopting Official Guidelines and Short Documents

Resolution on the Critical Role of Teachers in the Selection and Implementation of Reading Programs and Policies

Date: November 30, 2006
Category: Curriculum, Education Policy, Instruction, Literacy, Literature, Reading, Teaching Materials
Print Statement
2006 NCTE Annual Business Meeting in Nashville, Tennessee

Background

NCTE came into being in 1911 because English teachers were responding to curriculum mandates from universities. Since that time, NCTE has been in the forefront of honoring the capabilities of teachers and teacher educators to be curriculum developers. In the current context of high-stakes accountability and the resulting curricular constraints placed on classroom teachers, NCTE must reassert the authority of teachers as professionals who make substantive decisions regarding literacy materials and instruction.

NCTE has acted over the years to recognize teachers as professional decision makers. NCTE also has promoted effective literacy programs and authentic assessment. NCTE’s position statement “On the Reading First Initiative” (2002) clearly outlines professional concerns about the implementation of federal acts that result in mandates at the state, district, or local school level. NCTE’s “Features of Literacy Programs: A Decision-Making Matrix” (2005) offers guidelines for structuring critical conversations as part of the informed decision-making process.

Currently, teachers of English, language arts, and reading are being severely limited in the materials and methods they are permitted to use. In addition, teachers’ rights to use their professional judgment and experience on behalf of their students are highly constrained. Therefore, NCTE must reassert the critical role of teachers in the selection and implementation of reading programs and policies. Be it therefore

Resolution

Resolved, that the National Council of Teachers of English promote

  • active collaboration among teachers, administrators, and school board members in the selection and implementation of programs and materials for the teaching of reading;
  • education of policymakers, school board members, and school administrators in the areas of reading and language education so that their actions and policies reflect current research and effective practices in reading; and
  • development of protocols, decision-making tools, and participation structures for use by school personnel engaging in curriculum processes.

 

This position statement may be printed, copied, and disseminated without permission from NCTE.

  • About
  • Get Involved
  • Events
  • Resources
  • Groups
  • Membership
  • FAQs
  • Donations
  • Blog
  • Shop
  • Contact Us
  • Press
  • Advertisers
  • Career Opportunities
  • NCTE Connects

Subscribe to INBOX

INBOX is a biweekly email wrap-up of the most important stories in English language arts education, ideas for your classroom, and news from NCTE.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • YouTube

© 1998-2020 NCTE. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Links Policy
  • Terms of Use